<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Myth Number One</title>
	<link>http://www.ficml.org/jemimap/wordpress/2002/10/01/myth-number-one/</link>
	<description>Cheating on the Kobayashi Maru since 2001</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 06:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mia</title>
		<link>http://www.ficml.org/jemimap/wordpress/2002/10/01/myth-number-one/#comment-122</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2002 05:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.ficml.org/jemimap/wordpress/2002/10/01/myth-number-one/#comment-122</guid>
					<description>Maybe it's a product of my background (too many hours spent reading, too many years spent studying literature), but I definitely notice improvements in writing style, structure, pace and so on in other people's work. Sometimes the difference is dramatic - usually when the writer has realised that betas are a very good thing. Sometimes it's just that the writer has developed a better "ear", or a little confidence. But I generally notice. It gets irritating, though, when the Inner Critic keeps pointing out the flaws.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a product of my background (too many hours spent reading, too many years spent studying literature), but I definitely notice improvements in writing style, structure, pace and so on in other people&#8217;s work. Sometimes the difference is dramatic - usually when the writer has realised that betas are a very good thing. Sometimes it&#8217;s just that the writer has developed a better &#8220;ear&#8221;, or a little confidence. But I generally notice. It gets irritating, though, when the Inner Critic keeps pointing out the flaws.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
