Archive for the 'Fandom' Category

Synonyms for Seema

Monday, January 13th, 2003

Seema doesn’t feel right about the gift terminology, so I dug up some other options from Roget’s:

gift, donation, present, cadeau[obs3]; fairing; free gift, boon, favor, benefaction, grant, offering, oblation, sacrifice, immolation; lagniappe [U.S.], pilon [obs3][U.S.].
grace, act of grace, bonus.
allowance, contribution, subscription, subsidy, tribute, subvention.
bequest, legacy, devise, will, dotation[obs3], dot, appanage; voluntary settlement, voluntary conveyance &c. 783; amortization.
alms, largess, bounty, dole, sportule|, donative[obs3], help, oblation, offertory, honorarium, gratuity, Peter pence, sportula[obs3], Christmas box, Easter offering, vail[obs3], douceur[Fr], drink money, pourboire, trinkgeld[Ger], bakshish[obs3]; fee &c. (recompense) 973; consideration.
bribe, bait, ground bait; peace offering, handsel; boodle*, graft, grease*

So how about, the fic is the contribution; the feedback is the receipt?

Did I mention I turned on MovableType’s auto-ping feature a while back? Anyone who just can’t sleep at night without knowing whether the blog has been updated can track it at blo.gs or weblogs.com.

The Gift

Sunday, January 12th, 2003

Quote of the day: [T]he story is the gift. My feedback is the thank-you note. End of transaction. –Te

Te inspired an immensely long thread at fandom_wank, which brought out an interesting response from Alara Rogers about women in packs. I don’t intend to say anything new or deep about it, but I figure that some of my readers might have wisely overlooked the latest LiveJournal shennanigans.

First of all, I agree with Te. My fic is the gift. Your feedback is the thank-you note. In 99% of cases, the transaction ends after the gift, not after the thank-you note. You may think you’re coming under the radar by not sending feedback, but I track all my hits. I know how few of you send thank-you notes. You’re not fooling anyone.

However, my fic is a free gift. I do not do it for the feedback. (I wrote a logic lesson a while back for those of you who think that’s impossible. Here are two of my other posts on feedback: feedback and feedback and contests.) If you don’t want to send feedback, don’t. If you can’t think of something to say, don’t worry about it. I may set up a feedback form to alleviate the reader’s feedback guilt someday, but it won’t be soon. I have XML to convert first.

If you happen to be, as we say in Portuguese, bem-educado enough to email feedback, I will answer it - not because I’m under any obligation to do so, but because I, too, am bem-educada. If you post feedback in a public forum, such as ASC, the J/C Index, or a mailing list that I’m on, I may or may not reply, depending on whether I see the post in the first place, and whether I think replying will waste more bandwidth than my reply is worth. If you post feedback to a mailing list that I’m not on, of course I won’t reply, because I won’t see it. I may hear rumors of your feedback, but an email in the inbox is worth two in the ether.

If I ever became so popular that I had a backlog of feedback, I might not be as industrious as Te is, making the effort to reply to every email. There is a point at which that sort of thing becomes a burden, and there is no moral or social obligation in RL to reply to every thank-you note or piece of fanmail you receive. Fortunately, I’m in no danger of such fame. My fifteen minutes are up.

One thing no one has been able to explain to me is the objection to the term gift. I don’t know what else to call something made entirely by me, and given away to you (with or without hope of payment in feedback or in kind). Three or four times, I’ve given fanfic to individuals as a gift, on the occasion of birthdays or particularly painful Voyager episodes. Why, when I write a story and give it away to everyone, is it no longer a gift? If I embroidered a doily and gave it away, it would be a gift. Even if it’s a bit tatty and misstitched, even if it winds up a mathom, it’s still a gift. If I buy a book and give it away, it’s a gift. If I self-publish a book and give copies to my friends, they’re gifts. So why is my fanfic not a gift? Have I given it to too many people, simultaneously instead of serially?

There have been occasions where people thought they were responsible for my stories in some way, large or small - so that they might not think of them as mine to give away as gifts. In the case of writing in a group effort, copyright law clearly identifies the writer as the owner of the work, unless someone else has employed (not merely cajoled) the writer to write it on their behalf. There is no copyright in ideas or arcs, only in works that are instantiated in some medium. I also get the sense that certain fandom communities consider themselves responsible, as a group, for the achievements of individual members - specifically, they expect a certain kind of gratitude or loyalty, and will accuse those who move on to other fandoms of forgetting where they came from.

Of course I haven’t forgotten where I came from - I came from my mother and my father, the latter of whom, whether genetically or environmentally, is responsible for all this Trek. My lovely sister Veronica is responsible for my having taken a detour into Buffy. But the harsh truth is, I wrote the fic, every kilobyte of it. Maybe that ties this entry in to Alara’s women in packs:

Do I mean misogyny? Maybe not. It’s not a hatred of women that drives females to bay in packs and leap upon the prey, metaphorically tearing her throat out. It’s a hatred of women who excel, women who are well-known and well-liked and actually admit to knowing this about themselves, women who seek to improve themselves.

So maybe wank is the opposite of snark. Snark is more likely to mock the underachievers than the overachievers, not, perhaps, in principle but because sarcasm is a linguistic skill that is often accompanied by other writing skills - so the snarkers are the overachievers. Snark can also be inside the fic, while fandom_wank is always meta. I don’t see anyone mocking Te with fic, but I live to mock TPTB with fic. TPTB are the true oppressors here, the ones who own the show and do terrible things to the characters - so lay off the poor BNF’s already.

The Borg Queen

Wednesday, January 1st, 2003

Title: The Borg Queen
Author: Jemima
Contact: webmaster@jemimap.cjb.net
Series: VOY
Part: 1/1
Rating: G
Codes: filk
Summary: You’re not a true filker until you’ve filked “The Boxer.”

I am just a Borg drone
Though my role is manifold;
I once offered up resistance
Like a creature ruled by instinct -
Such are humanoids
All meat and vein
Now this drone does what she has to do
And disregards the pain.
She’ll comply…

When they took my home
And my family,
I was no more than a girl
Kidnapped by metallic strangers
To a silent maturation chamber
Drowning, scared,
Left to grow,
Taken out when I was finished,
Sent to check a manifold,
Seeing all the places
Only drones can go.

She’ll comply,
You’ll comply and he’ll comply,
She’ll comply,
Every living, breathing thing yes it will comply…

An assimilation chamber -
I’m assigned another job
But I see none like me,
Just an endless flow of those
Considered worthiest.
I cut and pare,
But sometimes one looks familiar and
I let them out of there.

She’ll comply,
You’ll comply and he’ll comply,
She’ll comply,
Every living, breathing thing yes it will comply…

And the years pass by like seasons on
A world I know is gone -
I am home
In a unimatrix lead by
One who once was me.
We expand,
Taking homes.

On a Borg cube reigns the Borg Queen,
Nexus to a billion brains,
From a nation long forgotten
By all save those who cut them down,
Re-engineered their children
To know neither fear nor pain,
Gave a number to their species
Of which only drones remain.

She’ll comply,
You’ll comply and he’ll comply,
She’ll comply,
Every living, breathing thing yes it will comply.
You’ll comply and he’ll comply,
She’ll comply,
Every living, breathing thing yes it will comply.

[Repeat ad nauseum]

SNW VI

Tuesday, December 31st, 2002

Congratulations to Penny and Monkee for placing in Strange New Worlds VI. I thought they’d used up their amateur status last time, but three’s the limit. Ladies, you are now professional science fiction writers. You can even join the union if you’d like.

Trek Remakes

Sunday, December 15th, 2002

Weird science site of the day: Hole in the Water answers the unasked question, Why do people get sucked into the vortex of a sinking ship?

By the way, filk radio has changed over to holiday music - but not your average holiday music. So far, Santa has gotten arrested, and now the song is about why (and I quote) Christmas sucks. The Trekathon is over, but Trek is eternal.

While waiting for The Twilight Zone to come on last week I was subjected to part of an Enterprise episode clearly ripped off from the TOS classic, “Elaan of Troyius”. I understand that TNG also stole Elaan for “The Perfect Mate.” I never cared much for TNG, and ENT is too similar for my tastes, with its bland cast, milk-run diplomacy, and recycled TOS plots.

Nemesis spoiler space…

Don’t make me say I told you so.

Tonight, I saw a remake of Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan. I’m a sucker for a handsome, genetically-engineered genocidal maniac with a Captain Ahab complex. Joachim wasn’t nearly cute enough this time around, but the doomsday device was lovely, complete with the requisite unusual waveform and yet another new kind of Trek radiation. Is there a list of those (and the particles - oh, the particles!) anywhere? Best of all was when the semi-human first officer designate sacrificed himself to save the ship, conveniently leaving his katra behind.

Speaking of first officers, I have to ask: is there any character more universally hated in Trek than Will Riker? The audience groaned whenever he did anything (or anyone), and I can’t believe there was anyone there besides me grossed out simply because Troi belongs with Picard. (If you don’t believe me, go read Lori’s Captain and Counselor series.) That being said, it wasn’t an ensemble movie the way The Wrath of Khan was. Nemesis was about Picard, the Anti-Picard, Data, and the Emergency Backup Data (so Veronica dubbed him), with a touch of Geordi for technobabble and some beating up of Riker to satisfy everyone’s deep-seated urge to punch the idiot’s lights out.

All-in-all, it was an even-numbered Trek movie.

Defending vs. Denying Plagiarism

Thursday, December 12th, 2002

Pretty site of the day: Network Simplicity
Though it resembles the bold, simple lines of CSS, this site is made with tables, for a 2002 look with a 1997 back-end. I found this one while investigating OpenSSH on Cygwin.

It’s been a while since I blogged about plagiarism, so I’ll summarize what I’ve said in the past. At first, I was mystified by the uproar against plagiarism because I don’t read fanfic for its originality. In fact, fanfic that was based in other authors’ playgrounds disturbed me, while rewriting television shows seemed perfectly innocuous.

Plagiarism is a moral issue, not a legal one, so the great debate always looks like a crusade. All the anti-plagiarists seize the moral high ground, but the pro-plagiarists can be divided into two camps, those who defend plagiarism, and those who deny it. That is to say, there are those who embrace their inner plagiarists, and there are those who try to weasel out of the charges.

The proper moral defense of plagiarism places it in a storytelling tradition in which originality has little, or even negative, value. Historically, originality hasn’t counted for much but today it does, making this
a radical defense. It simultaneously places all the plagiarized texts, from modern copyrighted novels to scripts of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, in the same communal, incestuous storytelling tradition. As R. J. pointed out, the original authors may not care for this extreme form of textual poaching, and readers of a non-communal persuasion (which is to say, almost all of us) will feel defrauded by authors who pass off others’ work as their own.

It takes a radical to adopt a radical stance on fanfic. Most pro-plagiarists maintain their positions by denying that any plagiarism happened, rather than defending plagiarism as a new moral good. They pussyfoot around with the definition of the word or they claim that an author’s note mentioning the victim de-plagiarizes direct, unmarked quotation of non-canon source materials. They pretend to believe that all of fanfic is plagiaristic, in order to excuse their plagiarism as just more fanfic writing.

Plagiarism is a moral offense, not a copyright violation, and can be defended only with moral arguments - that is, an explanation of why it is good and right for the plagiarist to incorporate someone else’s work seamlessly into their own. Arguments that it wasn’t quite plagiarism or that everybody does it will not do. That’s just denial of what is plain and clear to the average reader, and you know what they say about denial…

It’s not just a river in Egypt anymore.

Filk Radio II

Sunday, December 8th, 2002

This week on Filk Radio, they’re having a Trek marathon in honor of the new movie. The TOS filks are the best, but there’s a funny one on now about Data: he’s fully functional…and anatomically correct! It features some creative uses of technobabble imagery and a horta. I highly recommend Trek filk.

Why steal music (yes, you) when you can have free, fan-produced music? It’s like downloading pirated Christie Golden books without ever having read Penny Proctor. Put down Kazaa and go listen to something alternative. (Yes, you!)

The Sound of Sickbay

Thursday, December 5th, 2002

As a preface, I’d like to mention that this is all Liz’s fault.

Title:   The Sound of Sickbay
Author:  Jemima
Series:  VOY
Codes:   filk
Summary: Dead Again, the filk.
         Was: "The Sound of Silence."

*****

Hello Doctor, my old friend -
Am I your patient once again?
Was there a mishap on the holodeck?
Did Chakotay my best shuttle wreck?
Do the implants the Borg planted in my brain
Still remain?
Another round in sickbay...

So tell me, Doctor, did I die?
Tell me, did Chakotay cry?
Once more victim of a paradox,
Or stranded on another class-D rock?
If my lungs were grabbed by a dying Vidiian bore
Find me two more
Lying around in sickbay.

Faux crew assembled in the mess -
A hundred fifty, more or less.
People made out of deuterium,
People melting, pandemonium,
People getting hitched, completely unaware
They had no prayer -
No help was found in sickbay.

"Fools," said Q, "you do not know
Life eternal's deathly slow.
From my future you could save me,
Q's Continuum enslaves me."
Mortal Q a cup of hemlock downs
Dying
With renown in sickbay.

And the crewmen still salute
Captain Janeway lying mute.
And the sensors shrieked their warning,
Of a wormhole swiftly forming.
And the Borg said, "The words of the Prophets
Are useless when the wormhole roils;
Try transwarp coils."
Expiring to the sounds of sickbay.

Snark and snark, what is snark?

Wednesday, December 4th, 2002

Well, it’s that time of year, when the sub-freezing temperatures cause the original Bell-era (not Ma, Alexander Graham) phone lines to contract and my surfing is intermittent at best. Luckily for me, I checked fandom wank before the line gave out, so I have something brief to blog. I have some longer topics outstanding - Internet Types and a few children’s fantasies I read over Thanksgiving - but it’s late and I’m in the mood for snark.

Today’s most notable wank entry was about anti-wank sentiment, and the most notable anti-wank was by Joan the English Chick. Joan the English Chick is, if she’ll excuse the expression, a BNF from Buffy fandom - more specificially, she’s the woman responsible for the last few seasons of Buffy Transcripts. Her LJ entry argues the deleterious effects of “snark for snark’s sake” upon fandom.

Let me make this perfectly clear (for you S’s out there) - my position is that snark is the essence of fandom, and more specificially, of fanfiction. Snark is far and away the main appeal of fandom to me; snark is the main inspiration of my fic. There is no way to snark - snark is the way.

I get the feeling that Joan doesn’t define snark the way I do. I equate snark with sarcasm. Sarcasm ranges from bitter complaints to caustic remarks to gentle gibes to simple irony. Sarcasm is not just a vice, it’s a language - the language of fandom. Joan says:

The temptation to say something snarky and witty, and thus entertaining, but devoid of actual content, is apparently too much for a lot of people to resist.

I’m not in fandom to have deep discussions about, Kahless help us, the tragedies of Janeway’s non-canonical past or the thematic commonality between Star Trek: Voyager and the Odyssey. I am here to entertain. I read other people’s fic in order to be entertained. I won’t use the h-word, but none of us can claim we’re in fandom to save the seals or feed the hungry. Is my fic devoid of content because it’s entertaining? No. Neither is snark devoid of content because it’s entertaining. Wit amuses because it has content - you cannot be witty without a topic, without saying something that strikes home.

Of course, you can go the long way around to content, and have extended, serious discussions about Justin Tighe (ugh) or Odysseus. I’d rather make my points more briefly and entertainingly. I don’t have the time for infinite LJ discussions of the eternal topics. Similarly, when writing or reading fanfic, I prefer something said briefly and ironically over long novels of deadly serious angst or equally sober romance. Irony is my favorite theme, though I’ll settle for a good tragedy (which is, by the way, not the same thing as angst).

The interplay between fanfic and canon is, to me, always a snarky one. Where slash writers look for the essential slashiness of the show, I look for the fundamental snarkiness. I write about Janeway’s abandoned lizard babies coming back to haunt her, about the joy of being Borg, about a Mirror Mirror universe in which the canon universe is the evil one. I’m in it for the irony.

It’s entirely possible that the difference between Joan and yours truly is a wider difference between Trek fandom and Buffy fandom. Compare, for instance, Joan’s Buffy transcripts, which are, literally, transcripts with some stage directions, to Jim Wright’s Voyager transcripts, which are extended snarks with some semi-accurate dialogue included. I’m indebted to Joan for Buffy reference material, but Jim has brought me hours of entertainment. If I were stuck on a desert island with only one set of transcripts, I’d take Delta Blues.

Buffy is a show with, arguably, themes - the quality is relatively high for television, with or without pity. I can imagine Joan having intelligent discussions about Buffy. Trek, on the other hand, is very bad science fiction, with a long history of marginal production values and bad acting. Themes are not what spring to mind after Yet Another Time Travel Episode™. Whenever someone seriously complains about a current Trek series (as opposed to snarking about it), I have to ask, “Have you seen TOS?” Can Scott Bakula hold a candle to William Shatner when it comes to bad acting? Can Enterprise out-TOS TOS with execrable scripts? Can I watch with a straight face? No.

I have years of fond Trek snarking behind me, and, Paramount willing, years more to come. I wouldn’t trade a single snark for a treatise on the sociocultural implications of Benjamin Sisko qua Emissary - unless, of course, it were meant snarkily. If that means I’ve gotten “too deeply into the snark/wank mindset,” I don’t blame fandom wank. I blame Spock’s Brain.

Fanfic Genres

Thursday, November 14th, 2002

Word count: 21,024

I have a thousand words to go before I sleep, but for my thousand-word break, I thought I’d reflect a bit on Seema’s lovely interview with Kelly Chambliss. The title says it all: Hurting the Ones We Love. Kelly is highly qualified in two genres I don’t care for at all: smut and angst. That’s not to say I haven’t read her fic and appreciated it, but when I like angst I like it despite its being angst, and not because of it.

When, on the other hand, I read science fiction, I like it because it’s science fiction, and not despite the technobabble. It’s an issue of genre. In the interview, Kelly talks quite a bit about the genre of smut. Smut is queen in fanfiction largely because, as Kelly mentions, there isn’t much smut outside of fanfic. It’s popular as an up and coming new genre. Fanfic makes smut easy with its short-story format - you can’t, in general, base an entire commercial novel on sex acts - and pre-fab characters. The same goes for slash.

None of the above is meant as a critique of smut or slash - I don’t have time for that because it’s getting late. I’m only concerned with them as genres, and why different people like different genres. It’s a simpler mystery than why different people like different books within the same genre - that is, it’s easier to understand someone disliking all fantasy novels than someone not caring for The Lord of the Rings.

Sometimes it comes down to personality - science fiction is the province of the geeky type (or N’s, for the Myers-Briggs fans). Fantasy is related, but doesn’t quite cover the same fanbase, as it were. Angst, on the other hand, is never fantastic. Angst is only angst if it’s on the human level of flaws. Tragic flaws are a bit too much for angst; they end too splendidly. Romance is the opposite; romance must be about the virtue of the beloved and can, if not weighed down with too much smut, be fairly idealistic.

Smut, like angst, has to be at the nitty-gritty human level. There is nothing fantastic to part A and slot B; it is realism, impure and simple. Realism never interests me as such, though I can admire the plotting skill or the lovely language. Other people feel the same way about idealism. It’s nothing personal; it’s just genre.